We win when you win.
A share in the measured gains we create — the alignment no agency offers, and the reason skeptical owners trust the long game.
The alignment mechanism no agency offers, and the reason a skeptical owner trusts the long-term relationship. A slice of our compensation is tied to the measured gains we create — the revenue we grow and the costs we cut.
This only works because measurement is built in from the Map stage onward. Most firms get paid whether your AI works or not. We’re built to be paid more when it does — which means our incentives point the same direction as yours from day one.
of the performance share is measured against baselines agreed up front in the Map stage — never against metrics chosen after the fact.
How the model is structured
Compound
Outcome-based alignment
A compensation structure where part of our pay is tied to the measured revenue we grow and the costs we cut.
Baselines from the Map stage
The reference metrics established at the start that make a performance share real rather than rhetorical.
Measured revenue and cost impact
Transparent tracking of the gains the system actually produces, against the baseline everyone agreed to.
A long-term partnership
A relationship that compounds — we stay invested because our upside grows with yours.
Most vendors get paid whether it works or not.
Traditional consulting bills for time. Software bills for seats. Neither has any stake in whether the thing actually moves your business. That misalignment is why so much AI spend produces activity instead of results. We structure the relationship so that our upside depends on yours.
The misalignments we reject
Billing for hours
Getting paid for time spent rather than value delivered.
Selling tools and leaving
Handing over software with no stake in whether it produces anything.
Vanity metrics
Reporting activity that looks good but never touches revenue or cost.
Outcomes with no baseline
Claiming impact that can’t be proven because nothing was measured up front.
How we work
Skin in the game
Real alignment, not detached vendor billing. We grow when you grow.
Measurement is the moat
A performance share has nothing to anchor to without baselines. Our evaluation discipline is what makes outcome-based pricing possible.
Outcomes, not activity
We’re judged by what moves in your business, not by hours billed or demos shipped.
What people ask
How does the performance share actually work?+
A portion of our compensation is tied to measured gains — the revenue we grow or the costs we cut — against the baselines set during the Map stage. The specifics are structured case by case.
Doesn’t this require trusting your measurement?+
It requires shared, transparent measurement — which is exactly why evaluation is built in from the start. The baseline and the metrics are agreed up front, so the gains aren’t our opinion.
Is the whole engagement priced this way?+
No. The model has a build investment and an operating fee as well; the performance share is the alignment layer on top. We discuss structure openly once value is clear.
What if the gains are hard to attribute?+
Then we don’t claim them. We only tie pay to outcomes we can measure cleanly against an agreed baseline — anything else would undermine the trust the model depends on.
Let’s talk about your operation.
A first conversation with the people who build. If there’s a fit, we explain how this stage is structured. If not, we say so.